Realtime View of Your Compliance Program. Let Trustero Intelligence Build the Report You Need.

Control Tests and TI Playbooks produce named, timestamped Reports stored in a repository. Dashboards show the current state of your program - and the history behind it. Both are fully customizable, exportable, and built to connect.
Every AI workflow your team runs - whether a Control Test or a Playbook - produces a report. That report has a name, a timestamp, and a permanent place in the repository. From there it can be printed, exported, shared, or fed as input into the next Playbook - so a control test that surfaces failures can automatically become the starting point for a risk analysis workflow. Dashboards complement this with a live view of the current program state and the historical trends behind it, scoped to exactly the controls, frameworks, or services your team needs to see.

Workflow-Generated Reports

Every Control Test and Playbook run produces a named, timestamped report - automatically stored in the repository, ready to share, export, or use as input for the next workflow.

Connected Workflows

Reports don't just record findings - they can feed directly into another Playbook. A control test report becomes the input for a risk analysis. A policy assessment feeds a remediation plan workflow.

Live and Historical Dashboards

Dashboards show the current state of your program and the historical trends behind it - scoped by framework, label, department, or any combination your program requires.

From Workflow to Record to Insight. Continuously.

Control Tests and Playbooks are the engines. Reports are the durable record of what they found. Dashboards are the live view of what it means for your program - right now and over time.

Every Run Is Automatically Documented

Control Tests and Playbooks produce reports without any manual effort. Named, timestamped, and stored the moment a run completes - cited findings and AI reasoning captured for every assessment.

Reports That Connect Workflows

A report isn't just a record - it's an input. Feed a control test report into a Playbook that analyzes the risks of failing controls. Chain workflows together so each assessment builds on the last.

Scoped to Exactly What You Need

Use custom labels to define the scope of any report or dashboard. Limit a control test and its report to a specific service. View a dashboard filtered to one product line, one department, or one team's controls.

Built for Every Audience

Print or export any report or dashboard to PDF. Export control test results to CSV. Use them directly in presentations to management, executives, Risk & Audit Committee, auditors, regulators.

FIVE REQUEST TYPES

The Right Ask for Every Situation

Every time a workflow runs in Trustero - whether a Control Test or a Playbook - it produces a report. That report is generated by the Trustero AI and stored automatically in the Reports repository the moment the run completes. It has a name, a timestamp, and a permanent place in the repository independent of the chat or session where the run took place.

Reports are the durable record of what was performed or assessed, and what was found. A Control Test report captures per-control pass/fail results, per-procedure AI reasoning, and citations linking back to the source evidence and policy documents. A Playbook Summary captures what the playbook analyzed, what it found, and what it recommends - with narrative sections and embedded charts. A Policy Design Assessment report provides a section-by-section breakdown of a framework's requirements against your policies, with each requirement marked as met, not met, or partially met, and citations to the source documents.

What makes reports more than a static record is that they can be used as input for another Playbook. Run a full Control Test, receive a report of the results, and feed that report directly into a Playbook that analyzes the risk implications of the failing controls. Each workflow's output becomes the next workflow's starting point - creating a connected chain of AI-driven analysis that builds on itself over time.

Custom labels give you precise control over scope. Tag controls, policies, or evidence with a label - for a specific product, service, or team - and run a Control Test or Playbook scoped to only those labeled artifacts. The resulting report reflects exactly the slice of your program you need.

How-it-works
Reports generated automatically at the end of every Control Test and Playbook run - no manual authoring
Stored permanently in the Reports repository with a name, timestamp, and category
Control Test reports: per-control pass/fail, per-procedure AI reasoning, citations to source evidence and policies
Playbook Summary reports: findings, recommendations, and narrative analysis from any playbook run
PDA reports: per-requirement met/not-met/partially-met findings with policy citations, across any framework
Reports can be used directly as input for a subsequent Playbook - chain workflows together
Findings and Recommendations convert into tracked Requests in one action - linked to the affected record and assigned to its owner
Scope any run with custom labels - limit reports to artifacts tagged for a specific service, product, or team
Shareable via permalink; exportable to PDF
See Reports in Action

DASHBOARDS

The Current State of Your Program - and the History Behind It.

Dashboards show where your compliance program stands right now. But they also show how you got here - with historical trend data that accumulates across runs over time, so you can see how control performance for a framework has evolved over the past 12 months, not just what it looks like today.

Four dashboards give you a complete view of your program from different angles. The Overview dashboard is a 12-tile grid covering the current state of frameworks, open audits, controls, evidence, policies, risks, requests, and vendors - alongside sparklines of recent AI activity. Every tile drills into the relevant index.

The Operating Effectiveness dashboard shows control test results two ways: an executive summary with donut charts and trend lines per framework, and a per-control heatmap where clicking any control surfaces its full historical result timeline. The trend data accumulates across every run - giving you a period selectable view of how control performance has changed as your program matures.

The Risk Response dashboard visualizes how well controls are mitigating risks - with a management overview, residual vs. inherent risk views, and a Risk Heatmap, with targeted and actual residual risk. From there you can dive deeper and see how controls performance affect each risk.

The Compliance dashboard is the audit readiness hub: progress cards across policies, controls, risks, and requests, each with drill-down links into the records that need attention. Download Work Papers and a Pro Forma SOC 2 report directly from the dashboard.

Like reports, every dashboard is customizable by scope. Filter by framework, department, assignee, or custom label - so a dashboard scoped to a specific service or product line shows only the controls, risks, and evidence tagged for that context. Filter state is preserved in the URL, making any scoped view shareable as a link.

How-it-works
Dashboards fed continuously by Control Test and Playbook run data - always current
Historical trend data accumulates across runs: view control performance for any framework over the past 12 months
Filter any dashboard by framework, department, assignee, date range, or custom label
Custom labels scope dashboards to a specific service, product line, team, or any tagged subset of your program
Filter state preserved in URL - any scoped dashboard view is shareable as a direct link
Overview: 12-tile current-state grid with AI activity sparklines and personal assigned-requests banner
Operating Effectiveness: executive summary (donut + trend) and per-control heatmap with full historical drill-down
Risk Response: mitigation coverage, residual vs. inherent comparison, per-risk scatter plot with hover detail
Compliance: roadmap progress cards, Control Tests widget, recent activity changelog
Export any dashboard to PDF; download Work Papers and Pro Forma SOC 2 report from the Compliance dashboard
See Reports in Action

How Compliance and Risk Teams Use Reports & Dashboards Every Day

Chain Workflows to Go Deeper

Run a Control Test scoped to a specific service. Feed the report into a Playbook that analyzes the risk implications of the failures. Each workflow's output becomes the next one's starting point.

Scope Everything to What Actually Matters

Use custom labels to run a control test, generate a report, and view a dashboard scoped to a single product line, customer segment, or internal team - without noise from the rest of the program.

Show Improvement Over Time

The Operating Effectiveness dashboard accumulates control test results across runs. Pull up a 12-month trend for any framework and show exactly how the program has improved - for an executive briefing or an audit walkthrough.

How Compliance and Risk Teams Use Reports & Dashboards Every Day

From chaining AI workflows to scoping program views by service, Reports and Dashboards give compliance and risk teams both the historical record and the live visibility to run a mature, connected program.
GRC Director / Compliance Manager
A Control Test Report Becomes a Risk Analysis

Scenario:
A GRC director runs a full Control Test across the SOC 2 framework. The report is generated automatically - per-control results, per-procedure citations, gaps and recommendations. Rather than treating the report as the end of the workflow, the director feeds it directly into a Playbook that analyzes the risk implications of the failing controls: which risks lack sufficient mitigating coverage, which are approaching the residual threshold, and what remediation priority order the AI recommends. The second report is stored alongside the first. Both are now linked artifacts in the program's record.

Outcome: A control assessment and a risk analysis - connected, documented, and stored - produced as a single chained workflow rather than two separate manual processes.
GRC Audit Manager
A Service-Scoped View from Label to Dashboard

Scenario:
A company runs two distinct product lines, each with different compliance obligations. The compliance team has tagged all controls, policies, and evidence for each product line with a custom label. Before a customer audit for one product line, the GRC Audit Manager runs a Control Test scoped to that label - the resulting report covers only the controls relevant to that customer. They then open the Operating Effectiveness dashboard filtered to the same label and export it to PDF. The product team sees a precise, scoped view of their service's control performance - not the full program.

Outcome: A customer-ready compliance view scoped exactly to the relevant service - generated from the same program data, without maintaining a separate GRC instance.
Compliance Program Manager / Chief Risk Officer
Showing 12 Months of Control Improvement to the Board

Scenario:
The Compliance Program Manager needs to demonstrate that their program has materially improved over the past year. They open the Operating Effectiveness Overview dashboard, set the date range to the past 12 months, and group by framework. The trend lines - fed by every Control Test run over that period - show a clear improvement in pass rates across SOC 2 and ISO 27001. They export the dashboard to PDF and include it in the Risk Committee deck. The historical data needed no assembly - it accumulated automatically with every run.

Outcome: A committee-ready compliance improvement narrative produced in minutes, backed by 12 months of accumulated AI assessment data.